Papanasam Movie Review
Papanasam Movie Review: A Remake That Works as Well As the Original
Right after watching Jeethu Joseph’s Malayalam blockbuster Drishyam (2013) for the first time, I couldn’t but help wondering how it would be if it was remade in other languages and who would probably do maximum justice to the lead role played wonderfully by Mohanlal. Of course this was way before the film became a huge success,before the various controversies it landed in regarding the authenticity of the film and eventually various remakes getting announced , made and even released (in case of Telugu and Kannada). The only person I felt confident about in terms of fitting into Mohanlal’s shoes was Kamal Haasan for various reasons. For starters Kamal Haasan continues to remain a major star in Tamil Cinema, retaining his fan following all over South India. Talking about how good an actor he is would be a futile exercise as he has already found a firm place for himself among the all-time best Indian actors, similar to Mohanlal. And of course the role requires someone with a lot of maturity, an actor who would look convincing as a family man with a wife and two daughters, and yet be a hero whom the audience would root for.

If Drishyam was all about Georgekutty (Mohanlal) and his family, Papanasam talks about Suyambulingam (Kamal Haasan). The setting may have changed from a place close to Thodupuzha in Kerala, to Papanasam close to Tenkasi, in Tirunelveli district of Tamil Nadu, but the premise remains the same. Suyambulingam is an orphan who found success thanks to his hard work and now he runs multiple businesses, most prominent being a local cable T.V network. Suyambulingam dotes on his family comprising of his wife Rani (Gautami Tadimalla) and two daughters, Selvi (Niveda Thomas) and Meena (Esther Anil). Suyambulingam is the sort of man for whom his family takes precedence over everything, they mean everything to him. Unfortunately one day something unexpected happens, throwing their lives in disarray. At the very outset it’s important to understand that Jeethu Joseph has more or less tried to remain faithful to Drishyam by retaining its core essence intact in Papanasam. The changes wherever visible (in case you’ve seen Drishyam) are just keeping the cultural context in mind and also to enhance some parts of the film.

Talking of the Tirunelveli accent it is indeed wonderful listening to Jeyamohan’s dialogues in the film. They carry the native flavour and sound extremely refreshing as well. Due credit also goes to noted writer Suka for training Kamal Haasan to carry out the Tirunelveli accent the right way, the result is out there for all of us to see and appreciate. The screenplay by Jeethu Joseph was one of the primary reasons why Drishyam worked so well, so no surprise here again that it is the backbone of Papanasam. While the actual drama and post conflict point events unroll in the 2nd half of Drishyam, in case of Papanasam, there is a lot more which happens in the 1st half, setting up the 2nd half wonderfully for a riveting thriller, or more of a mind game. If you are one of those who haven’t watched Drishyam or its other language versions, be rest assured you will be in for a wonderful journey in the 2nd half as the writing is taut and keeps you clinging to the edge of your seats mostly. Even for those who have seen Drishyam, its fun to see the proceedings unravel again with a new flavour.

Sujith Vaassudev’s cinematography is very good, he brings alive the natural beauty of the locations on the screen wonderfully. A special mention must be made of the climax scene where Ananth Mahadevan and Kamal Haasan share an emotional exchange of words, and instead of the camera panning to and forth and shifting the focus between the two people, it remains stationary, retaining the focus on the person who is speaking. A wonderfully written scene and enacted well by both the seasoned actors, the shot capturing makes it even more worthwhile on screen. A lot of people are wondering why Papanasam has a longer duration (181 minutes) when compared to an already lengthy Drishyam (164 minutes), but be rest assured there are no additional moments to showcase Kamal’s histrionics (as feared by many). The extra time is probably just a derivative of pacing being a little different with the change in language. Despite being a 3 hour long film it is engaging all the way, there’s hardly a moment when your attention gets affected. So editor Ayoob Khan seems to have worked well in tandem with Jeethu Joseph to ensure that the film does not suffer in terms of the length.

Gautami makes a triumphant return to acting; her scenes with Kamal Haasan in particular are a delight to watch. But ultimately Papanasam works and works well because of Kamal Haasan, as Suyambulingam he is someone who has us rooting for him without resorting to any over the top histrionics. He is restrained largely and is very much in control, does not have to depend on any gimmicks to prove a point as well. It is not worthwhile to argue and discuss as to who is better on screen, Mohanlal as Georgekutty or Kamal Haasan as Suyambulingam. Kamal’s portrayal is as good if not better than Mohanlal’s and he does it in his own way which makes me feel good about my initial feeling that he would be the right choice to step into Mohanlal’s shoes. With Papanasam Jeethu Joseph achieves the rare distinction of completing back to back films successfully with two master actors, in the process even ensuring that a remake can sometimes work as well as the original.
Note-In Mumbai and other cities outside South India (also in a few screens in Bangalore) Papanasam is playing with English subtitles. The subtitles by Rekhs not only work very well for the film, but they add a special flavour at a lot of places, including when the two songs appear on screen.